ABSTRACT
Background: There is a scarcity of information in literature regarding the clinical differences and co-morbidities of patients affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which could clarify the different prevalence of the outcomes (composite and only death) between several Italian regions.Objective: This study aimed to assess the heterogeneity of clinical features of patients with COVID-19 upon hospital admission and disease outcomes in the northern, central, and southern Italian regions.Methods: An observational cohort multicenter retrospective study including 1210 patients who were admitted for COVID-19 in Infectious diseases, Pulmonology, Endocrinology, Geriatrics and Internal Medicine Units in Italian cities stratified between north (263 patients);center (320 patients);and south (627 patients), during the first and second pandemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 (from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021). The data, obtained from clinical charts and collected in a single database, comprehended demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, hospital and home pharmacological therapies, oxygen therapy, laboratory values, discharge, death and Intensive care Unit (ICU) transfer. Death or ICU transfer were defined as composite outcomes.Results: Male patients were more frequent in the northern Italian region than in the central and southern regions. Diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, chronic pulmonary and chronic kidney diseases were the comorbidities more frequent in the southern region;cancer, heart failure, stroke and atrial fibrillation were more frequent in the central region. The prevalence of the composite outcome was recorded more fre-quently in the southern region. Multivariable analysis showed a direct association between the combined event and age, ischemic cardiac disease, and chronic kidney disease, in addition to the geographical area.Conclusions: Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in patients with COVID-19 characteristics at admission and outcomes from northern to southern Italy. The higher frequency of ICU transfer and death in the southern region may depend on the wider hospital admission of frail patients for the availability of more beds since the burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system was less intense in southern region. In any case, predictive analysis of clinical outcomes should consider that the geographical differences that may reflect clinical differences in patient characteristics, are also related to access to health-care facilities and care modalities. Overall, the present results caution against generalizability of prognostic scores in COVID-19 patients derived from hospital cohorts in different settings.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/li-censes/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with autoimmune systemic diseases (ASDs) can be counted among frail populations as regards the predisposition to COVID-19 due to the frequent visceral organ involvement and comorbidities, as well as the ongoing immunomodulating treatments. Objectives: Our long-term multicenter telephone survey prospectively investigated the prevalence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 in Italian ASD patients during the frst 3 pandemic waves. Methods: A large series of 3,918 ASD patients (815 M, 3103 F;mean age 59±12SD years) was consecutively recruited at the 36 referral centers of COVID-19 & ASD Italian Study Group. In particular, ASD series encompassed the following conditions: rheumatoid arthritis (n: 981), psoriatic arthritis (n: 471), ankylosing spondylitis (n: 159), systemic sclerosis (n: 1,738), systemic lupus (172), systemic vasculitis (n: 219), and a miscellany of other ASDs (n: 178). The development of COVID-19 was recorded by means of telephone survey using standardized symptom-assessment questionnaire (1). Results: A signifcantly increased prevalence of COVID-19 (8.37% vs 6.49%;p<0.0001) was observed in our ASD patients, while the cumulative death rate revealed statistically comparable to the Italian general population (3.65% vs 2.95%;p: ns). In particular, among the 328 ASD patients complicated by COVID-19, 57 (17%) needed hospitalization, while mild-moderate manifestations were observed in the large majority of individuals (83%). In addition, 12/57 hospitalized patients died due to severe interstitial pneumonia and/or cardiovascular manifestations. Interestingly, a signifcantly higher COVID-19-related death rate was observed in systemic sclerosis patients compared to the Italian general population (6.29% vs 2.95%;p=0.018). Other adverse prognostic factors to develop COVID-19 were the patients' older age, male gender, pre-existing ASD-related interstitial lung involvement, and chronic steroid treatment. Conversely, patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) showed a signifcantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 compared to those without (3.58% vs 46.99%;p=0.000), as well as the chronic administration of low dose aspirin in a subgroup of SSc patients (with 5.57% vs without 27.84%;p=0.000). Conclusion: The cumulative impact of COVID-19 on ASD patients after the frst 3 pandemic waves revealed less severe than that observed during the frst phase of pandemic (1), especially with regards to the death rate that was comparable to the Italian general population in spite of the increased prevalence of complicating COVID-19 in the same ASD series. Ongoing long-term treatments, mainly csDMARDs, might usefully contribute to generally positive outcomes of in this frail patients' population. Of note, a signifcantly increased COVID-19-related mortality was recorded in only SSc patients' subgroup, possibly favored by pre-existing lung fbrosis. Among different ASD, SSc deserves special attention, since it shares the main pathological alterations with COVID-19, namely the interstitial lung involvement and the endothelial injury responsible for diffuse microangiopathy. Besides SSc, the patients' subgroups characterized by older age, chronic steroid treatment, pre-existing interstitial lung disease, and/or impaired COVID-19 vaccine response (1-3), may deserve well-designed prevention and management strategies.
ABSTRACT
Background The presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in human semen and its role in virus contagion and semen quality after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still unclear. Recent reports evidence that, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, male reproductive function and semen quality may be damaged. Aim To evaluate the semen parameters and inflammation of sexually active men following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection at 1 month and 3 months follow-up after the second negative nasopharyngeal swab. Materials and methods A prospective cross-sectional study on sexually active men recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed. For previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients, data on serum inflammatory markers were retrospectively collected. One month after the second SARS-CoV-2 negative nasopharyngeal swab and 3 months later, four biological fluid samples, namely saliva, pre-ejaculation urine, semen, and post-ejaculation urine, were collected. The occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the specimen was evaluated in all the biological fluids collected by RT-PCR. Female partners were retested if any specimen was found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization manual edition V. Furthermore, semen inflammation was assessed by quantification of semen leukocytes and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels and evaluation of a panel of sperm cytokine levels by a two-step ELISA method. Results A total of 43 men were enrolled in the study. Three patients (7%) tested positive for at least one sample (one saliva;one pre-ejaculation urine;one semen and one post-ejaculation urine), so the next day new nasopharyngeal swabs were collected. The results from these 3 patients and their partners were all negative for SARS-CoV-2. At 1-month follow-up, 25% of the men with recent SARS-Cov-2 infections and proven healing were oligo-cryptoazoospermic, despite the absence of virus RNA in semen. Of the 11 men with semen impairment, 8 were azoospermic and 3 were oligospermic. Serum inflammatory markers (procalcitonin and C-reactive protein) were analyzed in previously hospitalized patients both at admission and at peak of infection. Levels at admission were statistically significantly higher in patients resulting in crypto-azoospermic with respect to those resulting in normozoospermic (p = 0.05;p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively) after healing. Oligo-crypto-azoospermia was significantly related to COVID-19 severity (P < 0.001). A total of 33 patients (76.7%) showed pathological levels of IL-8 in semen. Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were significantly negatively related to sperm total number and concentration, whereas interleukin-4 was correlated with sperm motility. At 3-months follow-up, 8/10 men with semen impairment showed an overall increase of semen parameters compared to levels assessed after 1 month. Of the 4 crypto-/azoo-spermic men 1 month after healing, 2 resulted oligozoospermic, 1 normozoospermic and only 1 remained azoospermic. Two of the 3 oligozoospermic men turned normozoozpermic. Semen cytokine levels remained elevated after 3 months, except for IL-6. Discussion and conclusion SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in saliva, urine, and semen in a small percentage of men who recovered from COVID-19. 25% of men who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated oligo-crypto-azoospermia. Negative correlations between interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α and sperm number and the overall high levels of semen cytokines indicate a potential detrimental role of SARS-CoV-2 driven inflammation on spermatogenesis. An overall tendency to an improvement of semen parameters was found although a genital tract inflammatory condition appears to persist at least 3 months after COVID-19 recovery. Despite the low number of enrolled patients may limit the statistical power of study and the fact that the previous semen quality of these men was unknown, our results indicate that male of reproductive age recovering from COVID-19 deserve accurate follow-up for their fertility status.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this pilot study was to describe the advantages of telemedicine (TM) in dental practice during the current national emergency condition due to the Covid-19 dissemination. At Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology-Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, regional reference center for Covid-19-two groups of patients were determined: patients with urgent conditions (group U) and patients in follow-up (group F). Both groups were instructed to implement remote consultations using a messaging service (WhatsApp Messenger, WhatsApp Inc., Mountain View, California, USA) to send photos. A total of 418 photos were collected by 57 patients. Thirty-four photos were obtained by five patients in the U group after surgical procedures. All patients sent photos on the established evening, except for two patients who sent two photos outside the set days. In the F group, 384 photos were collected by 52 patients. None of them sent more photos than the number that was established by the protocol. Telemedicine allowed a monitoring of all patients, reducing costs and limiting human contact, decreasing the risk of Covid-19 dissemination.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: In the last two decades, several therapeutic schemes have been proposed for erectile rehabilitation (ER) after radical prostatectomy (RP), but none has been standardized or validated due to the lack of high-level evidence in the Literature. We performed an international Survey focused on the current worldwide approach to ER, highlighting the contact and divergent aspects. Materials & Methods: We purposed an online Survey between July and December 2020 using email lists and Twitter, aiming to evaluate the ER protocols after RP performed by urologists and andrologists in daily practice. The following sections were investigated: 1) Demographics;2) Number and type of RP performed;3) Type and schedule, timing and duration of ER erectile programs;4) Standard treatment protocol. The specialists were contacted with the support of Confederación Americana de Urología (CAU), Urological SOcial MEdia (UroSoMe) Working Group, Functional Urology- Techno Urology- Research (FUTURe) Group and by a dedicated uro-andrologists spaces on Twitter platform of iTRUE Group. Results: The Survey was completed by 518 responders from 52 worldwide countries. The main criteria to candidate patients for ER were nerve sparing surgery (72.8%), lack of significant comorbidities (66.4%), patient’s request (55.4%), valid pre-operative EF (55%), age (48.1%), and partner’s willing (19.1%). Surgical techniques reported were: 38.9% open RP, 22.9% video laparoscopic RP, 38.2% robot- assisted RP. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) among the main surgical techniques and the time of EF recovery beginning, protocol and duration. The use of specific ER protocols was reported by 61.4%. The beginning of ER was reported by 33% of responders at catheter removal, after one month from surgery by 22%, and before RP by 15%. PDE5i were more frequently used as first line treatment (99.4%). Tadalafil 20 mg was the most prescribed in monotherapy, prescribed daily (48.2%) or 2-3 times/week (46%). PGE1 intra-cavernosal injection (67.9%) was the second more common prescription in monotherapy, followed by the association of PDE5i and vacuum device (29.6%). A minority of specialists 44/518 (8.5%) recommended low intensity shock wave therapy, while 63/518 (12.2%) proposed this in association to other therapies. The duration of ER was: in 16.2% <6 months, in 39% between 6 and 11 months;in 31.9% between 12 and 18 months;in 9.2% between 19-24 months, and in 3.7% >24 months. In case of first-line failure, the majority of the responders shifted to another treatment after at least 3 months (71%). During COVID-19 outbreak, the 37.4% of responders did not perform EF recovery consultations, while 26.8% had normal consultations, and 35.7% used telemedicine. Conclusions: This Survey showed an inhomogeneous approach to ER, reflecting the lack of high-level evidence on this topic. A worldwide accepted guideline on ER is therefore needed.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: The COVID-19 outbreak has brought challenges to the global healthcare community. The management of upper urinary tract stones has been affected even further, with potential severe sequelae for patient’s health.Materials & Methods: We report a multicentric retrospective study involving 9 Centers regularly delivering treatment for upper tract urinary stonesacross the country. All Centers suffered significant limitations during the pandemic period due to government limitations. We compared the 12months-period prior to COVID-19 (from march 1st 2019 to February 28th 2020, named as period A) with post-COVID-19 period (from march 1st,2020 to February 28th, 2021 named as period B). Aim of the study was to compare endourological procedures for upper urinary stones duringperiod A and the period B. This study investigated all types of surgeries for stones delivered in both elective and emergency setting.Results: A total of 4018 procedures were collected, including 2176 procedures in period A. In period B, 1842 procedures were carried out,corresponding to a loss of 15.35% of cases (p<0.001). Looking into elective cases, 1622 procedures were delivered in period A, compared to 1280in period B, resulting in a loss of 342 cases corresponding to 21.81% (p=0.001). All types of stone treatments resulted affected, including ESWL(from 487 cases in period A to 344 in period B, -29.37%, p=0.001), PCNLs (from 170 to 125 cases, corresponding to -26.47%, p:0.008), retrogradesurgery for renal stones (from 433 to 387 cases, -10.63%, p=0.008) and for ureteric stones (from 614 cases to 484, -21.18%, p.008). Additionally,waiting lists resulted affected, with significant delays in period B. In particular, for ureteric stones, mean waiting time in period A was 61.5 dayscompared to 87.5 days in period B (p=0.008). Regarding renal stones, waiting list increased from 64.74 days in period A to 85.66 days in periodB for RIRS. The waiting list for percutaneous surgeries increased from 79 days to 103 days (p.001). We did not find any patient which acquiredCOVID-19 during hospitalization for elective or urgent surgery. We also found a longer waiting list for pre-stented patients, resulting to be 86.5 daysin period B compared to 64 days in period A (p<0.005).Conclusions: Our study showed how COVID-19 caused a significant disruption in endourological services across the country. Our data underlined how less patients received treatment in a longer time. This can potentially lead to an increased risk of stone-related complications, including sepsis and kidney loss
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the perception of the risk and prevention of work-related COVID-19 infection in dentistry during the first week of the virus dissemination in Italy. Methods: The study was implemented as a cross-sectional study. The sample was composed of Italians of the age 18 and over and with a personal computer (PCs), tablets or smartphones connected to the web. An anonymous online survey was distributed using social media platforms and all the participants sent their responses. The outcome variable was the perception of COVID-19 risk dissemination at the dental office. Other study variables evaluated include the ability to distinguish between urgent and deferable oral surgical procedures, the perception of COVID-19 dissemination in oral surgical treatments compared to other medical procedures and the concomitant state of anxiety of the Italians. Results: The study sample included 512 participants (315 women and 197 men). Most of the participants (306, 59,8%) declared that at this moment dental procedures are quite risky, 67 respondents declared that there is a high risk for COVID-19 dissemination and 139 participants defined absent the risk of the virus dissemination after oral surgical procedures. The respondents declared that the most urgent and not-deferrable dental problems are dental abscess (72%), dental trauma (61%), and biopsy for suspect lesions of the oral cavity (49%). Comparing oral surgical treatments with other medical procedures the risk of COVID-19 dissemination was the same for most of the respondents. Results of HAM-A questionnaire showed that the majority of participants (87.3%) had a mild severity of anxiety symptoms (score ≤ 17). Most Italians perceive the risk of COVID-19 dissemination in oral surgical procedures, suggesting these last only in urgent cases. This diffuse concern increases the mild level of anxiety of Italian population. © 2021, Nova Science Publishers, Inc.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen and its role in virus transmission and semen quality after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still undefined. To date, studies evaluating semen quality and the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of infected or proven recovered men are scarce and include a limited number of cases. Aim of this study is to evaluate the semen quality of sexually active men following recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Materials & Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study on sexually active men who were known to have recovered from SARS-CoV2 was performed, after Ethical Appraisal (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04446169). Four biological fluid samples, specifically saliva, pre-ejaculation urine, semen and post-ejaculation urine, were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 genome by RT-PCR. Routine semen parameters and quantification of semen leukocytes and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels were evaluated according to the World Health Organization manual edition V and by a two-step ELISA method respectively. Questionnaires including International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Short Form were administered to all subjects. Results: From 326SARS-CoV-2 positive male patients, 160 (49%) we re eligible.Amongthem,117were excluded, 55 because werenotreachable by phone, 46 refused to participate and other 16 were unable to collect semen samples. Therefore, 43 patients were finally enrolled. Among them. 3 patients (7%) tested positive for at least one sample (1 saliva;1 pre-ejaculation urine;1 semen and 1 post-ejaculation urine),so the day after new nasopharyngeal swabs were collected. The results from these three patients and their partners were all negative for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 25% of the men studied were oligo-crypto-azoospermic after recovery from COVID-19. Of the 11 men with semen impairment, 8 were azoospermic and 3 were oligospermic. A total of 33 patients (76.7%) showed pathological levels of IL-8 in semen. Oligo-crypto-azoospermia was significantly related to COVID-19 severity (p<0.001). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in saliva, urine and semen in a small percentage of men who recovered from COVID-19. One-quarter of men who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated oligo-crypto-azoospermia showing that an evaluation of semen quality should be recommended for men of reproductive age who are affected by COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection poses a serious challenge for patients with rheumatic autoimmune systemic diseases (ASD), characterized by marked immune-system dysregulation and frequent visceral organ involvement. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a large series of Italian patients with ASD. Methods: Our multicenter telephone survey (8-week period, March-April 2020) included a large series of 2,994 patients (584 M, 2,410 F, mean age 58.9±13.4SD years) with ASD followed at 34 tertiary referral centers of 14 regions of northern, central, and southern Italian macro areas, characterized by different prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. According to currently used criteria, COVID-19 was classified as definite COVID-19 (signs or symptoms of COVID-19 confirmed by positive oral/nasopharyngeal swabs at PCR testing) or highly suspected COVID-19 (signs or symptoms highly suggestive of Covid-19, but not confirmed by PCR testing due to limited availability of virological tests in that period). The results were analyzed performing the Odds Ratio by Java-Stat 2-way Contingency Table Analysis. Results: The main findings of the survey study revealed a significantly increased prevalence of COVID-19 in: a.the whole series of ASD patients (definite Covid-19: 22/2994, 0.73%;p=0.0007;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 74/2,994, 2.47%;p<0.0001) when compared to Italian general population of COVID-19 infected individuals (349/100000 = 0.34%;data from Italian Superior Institute of Health;h t t p s : / / w w w . e p i c e n t r o . i s s . i t / e n / c o r o n a v i r u s / sars-cov-2-national-surveillance-system). b.the subgroup of patients with connective tissue diseases or systemic vasculitis (n = 1,901) compared to the subgroup of inflammatory arthritis (n = 1,093), namely rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (definite Covid-19: 19/1,901, 0.99%, vs 3/1,093, 0.27%;p=0.036;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 69/1,901, 3.6%, vs 5/1,093, 0.45%;p<0.0001) c.the subgroup of patients with pre-existing interstitial lung involvement (n = 526) compared to those without (n = 2,468) (definite Covid-19: 10/526, 1.90%, vs 12/2,468, 0.48%;p=0.0015;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 33/526, 6.27%, vs 41/2,468, 1.66%;p<0.0001). Of interest, the prevalence of COVID-19 did not correlate with presence/absence of different comorbidities, mainly diabetes, cardio-vascular and/or renal disorders, as well as of ongoing treatments with biological DMARDs;while patients treated with conventional DMARDs showed a significantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 compared to those without. COVID-19 was more frequently observed in the patients' populations from northern and central compared to southern Italian macro area with lower diffusion of pandemic. Clinical manifestations of Covid-19, observed in 74 patients, were generally mild or moderate;4/9 individuals requiring hospital admission died for severe pneumonia. Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 observed in ASD patients during the first wave of pandemic was significantly higher than that observed in Italian general population;moreover, the actual prevalence of COVID-19 might be underestimated due to the high number of mild variants as well as the possible clinical overlapping between these two conditions. Patients with ASD should be invariably regarded as 'frail patients' during the pandemic course, considering the risk of worse outcome in the acute phase of Covid-19, as well as the potential long-term effects of viral infection. The statistically significant association of COVID-19 with connective tissue diseases/ systemic vasculitis, as well as with pre-existing interstitial lung involvement, suggests the presence of distinct clinico-pathological ASD subsets, characterized by markedly different patients' vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
Summary The pandemic period is putting a strain on the organization of our respiratory physiopathology laboratories mainly due to the increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Only a profound reorganization and strict observance of disinfection rules can guarantee both operators and patients to work safely. The impulse to new technologies useful in the study of respiratory function will bring new vigor to an essential discipline for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying any single respiratory disease.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 outbreak represented an unprecedented event that led to a redefinition of health care systems worldwide. The impact of the emergency required a deviation of the care toward the assistance to COVID-19 patients, with reduction of resources for elective activities, including surgery. We aim to report the decrease of urological surgical activity during the first weeks from the beginning of the pandemic, aiming to highlight the prioritization we applied to select patients for surgery. Materials and methods: Thirty-three urological units with physicians affiliated to the AGILE group were involved in a survey. Urologists were asked to report the amount of surgical elective procedures week- by-week, from the beginning of the emergency to the following month. The type of surgery (oncologic, for urolithiasis, for benign prostate obstruction, other) was assessed as well. Results: The 33 hospitals involved in the study account, globally, for 22,945 beds and are distributed in 13/20 Italian regions. Before the outbreak, the involved urology units performed an overall amount of 1,213 procedures per week, half of which were oncological. By the 20 of March, the amount of surgery declined by 78%. Lombardy, the first region with positive-cases, experienced a 94% reduction. The decrease in oncological and non- oncological surgical activity was 35,9% and 89%, respectively. Among non-oncological procedures, stone surgery declined by 35,9% as well, whereas BPH and minor urological procedures completely dropped. Reassessing for surgical activity on 20, April, a slight trend toward surgical restoration (+11%) started to appear. Conclusions: Italy, the country with the highest fatality rate from COVID-19, had experienced a sudden decline in surgical activity;by the end of April, a current trend toward restoration of surgery started to appear. Criteria for prioritization were consistent with an urgent/ emergent principle, with trauma, tumours and septic conditions being the ones prioritized. The Italian experience can be helpful for future surgical pre-planning in other countries or pandemic settings. Smart Communications (SC1–SC28) Andrology
ABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: How is the semen quality of sexually active men following recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection? SUMMARY ANSWER: Twenty-five percent of the men with recent SARS-Cov-2 infections and proven healing were oligo-crypto-azoospermic, despite the absence of virus RNA in semen. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen and its role in virus contagion and semen quality after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still unclear. So far, studies evaluating semen quality and the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of infected or proven recovered men are scarce and included a limited number of participants. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective cross-sectional study on 43 sexually active men who were known to have recovered from SARS-CoV2 was performed. Four biological fluid samples, namely saliva, pre-ejaculation urine, semen, and post-ejaculation urine, were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Female partners were retested if any specimen was found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Routine semen analysis and quantification of semen leukocytes and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels were performed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Questionnaires including International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Short Form were administered to all subjects. The occurrence of virus RNA was evaluated in all the biological fluids collected by RT-PCR. Semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization manual edition V. Semen IL-8 levels were evaluated by a two-step ELISA method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After recovery from COVID-19, 25% of the men studied were oligo-crypto-azoospermic. Of the 11 men with semen impairment, 8 were azoospermic and 3 were oligospermic. A total of 33 patients (76.7%) showed pathological levels of IL-8 in semen. Oligo-crypto-azoospermia was significantly related to COVID-19 severity (P < 0.001). Three patients (7%) tested positive for at least one sample (one saliva; one pre-ejaculation urine; one semen and one post-ejaculation urine), so the next day new nasopharyngeal swabs were collected. The results from these three patients and their partners were all negative for SARS-CoV-2. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although crypto-azoospermia was found in a high percentage of men who had recovered from COVID-19, clearly exceeding the percentage found in the general population, the previous semen quality of these men was unknown nor is it known whether a recovery of testicular function was occurring. The low number of enrolled patients may limit the statistical power of study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in saliva, urine, and semen in a small percentage of men who recovered from COVID-19. One-quarter of men who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated oligo-crypto-azoospermia indicating that an assessment of semen quality should be recommended for men of reproductive age who are affected by COVID-19. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral , Semen , Semen AnalysisABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19, originated in China in December 2019, has spread worldwide pandemically. Infection control measures are especially needed for healthcare professionals who meet potentially infected patients. Objective: The authors aimed to provide general knowledge about COVID-19 disease and indications for the management of emergency dental procedures based on recent literature and experience gained. Methods: A literature search was performed to identify scientific information on COVID-19 and prevention of cross infection appropriate for the practice of dentistry. Results: The authors provided relevant information about SARS-CoV-2 virus, COVID-19 disease, and prevention of cross infections in the dental office. Furthermore, the authors described their experience and highlighted the potential of telemedicine. Conclusion: This article, based on relevant researches, guidelines and Authors’ experience in a COVID-19 Hospital, introduces essential knowledge about COVID-19 and transmission routes and provides recommended management protocols for dental practitioners.